Predictions

From my website posted 20th September 2001

I ran an anagram check for 'Afghanistan'  today. There are only two occurrences and they occur in verses with associated meaning.

Verse I.96

Verse III.76

My method implies the work has an English code that can be read as anagrams from left to right. The resultant analysis follows from using this method.

Verse I.96

To most modern eyes this looks like a set of unconnected ideas but ancient Chaldea included Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan, One of the main beliefs in that time involved Serapis , the Ox or Bull whose cipher/runa was the crescent which is the modern emblem for Islam. It also is associated with Taurus or the month of October/November. Separis/ Osiris represents the earth,  the spiritual nature of the lower world that is murdered and distributed throughout the substance of the physical spheres.

The imagery is strongly evocative of the Islamic regions both ancient and modern, with hints of fanaticism and destruction in both original and modern forms of this verse. All this identifies the verses containing the anagram of 'Afghanistan' as relevant to the modern time.

'plus aux rochiers ' also yields 'Auroch' and 'usual ox cipher'  . The Auroch was a wild ox and in the Norse runic lexicon this creature was  represented by  the rune 'Uruz"

Verse III.76 

The verse tells how a force using German built/made weaponry attacks a stronghold in Afghanistan. This is an ancient fort associated with royalty. The royal one attempts to escape and does so. This leads to the dismay of those who seek his capture.

These verses are linked by the idea of sects. Other prominent terms are the concept of a fort, captives, paganism and religious change.

Although there are only two verses with the anagram of Afghanistan there are another five where the anagram of Afghan can be found and another solitary verse where the anagram of  Afghan-terrorist can be found.. These verses are I.56. Line 1, II.25 line 1, II.66 line 2, II.83 line 1, IV.21 line 1 and VIII.53 line 4. There are many common elements in these verses.

Verse I.56 

In this verse there is great change and  a reference to an approach as in the earlier verses.

This verse can be arranged to read as follows. In so doing it links clearly to the earlier verses.

Verse I.56 

The next verse shows links to a captive fort as stated in earlier verses.

Verse II.25

Verse II.25 The first line and those that follow makes sense in the original and as anagrams. They refer to the mercenaries that served in the Afghan terrorist forces, in particular those who betrayed their own countries. The second line is a coding clue.

The next verse also refers to captives but in a palace

Verse II.66

Verse II.66